Well, any time Tuesday or early Wednesday would work for me.
I think that Jonathan needs to have the appointment be pre-work
hours. (01)
At 01:44 PM 2/10/2005, Peter Yim wrote:
>Phil,
>
> > Peter, are you clear of your deliverable by Monday evening
> > if that works for everyone?
>
>To be honest, I don't know, as it is a joint-community project that we
>committed to get out by Monday (which usually means "before people come to
>work on Tuesday"). I'd rather not commit to anything for Monday at all
>open, as it might even develop into an "all niter". Sorry.
>
>Any time Tuesday (especially now that you've ruled out early morning) will
>be fine for me. Early Wednesday morning is fine with me too (assuming you
>want to do that before your CHM meeting some time during the day.)
>
>Regards. -ppy
>--
>
>
>Philip Gust wrote Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:16 -0800:
>>Peter,
>>Thanks for the response. I just picked up a Tuesday 7-9am meeting, so
>>that morning is out. It's possible that we could do a virtual meeting via a
>>phone conference for the first meeting. It's primarily a planning meeting
>>to map out the project. It feels like some for of synchronous collaboration
>>would be appropriate for that. I could be available any time Tuesday for
>>such a meeting, including in the evening (I need to check my our home
>>calendar and confirm if evening is preferred). Peter, are you clear of your
>>deliverable by Monday evening if that works for everyone?
>>Thanks, too for the names. It would be great if Doug were able to persuade
>>Jeff to get involved. I need to contact him now that his party is over to see
>>how he'd like to participate, so I'll mention that. Hard to tell whether
>>Jeff is
>>more appropriate as a resource or as an active member of the committee.
>>I had a sense that Raylene might be appropriate as an active member if
>>she's willing to participate.
>>So let me know which times work best for an initial phone meeting if that
>>works for everyone. As I said, Tuesday 7-9am is no longer good for me.
>>At 12:57 PM 2/10/2005, Peter Yim wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Phil,
>>>
>>>Thank you for the message.
>>>
>>> > like to see if both of you would be available for an
>>> > organizing meeting next Monday or Tuesday ... breakfast
>>> > ... or dinner either day ...
>>>
>>>I have a major deliverable due Mon (2/14), therefore Tuesday is preferred.
>>>
>>>That said, if there is only going to be the three of us, and if there is
>>>no added value in meeting face-to-face, may I suggest a phone conference
>>>(augmented by whatever synchronous collaboration tool as we see fit)
>>>instead. If we really need to meet in person, I am game too!
>>>
>>> > ... Raylene Pak ...
>>>
>>>The entry in my address book has her as <raylene_pak@sbcglobal.net>. I
>>>have not quite corresponded w(or worked directly) with her before,
>>>although we both know each other's name well. That would be a good
>>>starting point if you want to try.
>>>
>>> > ... Jeff Oloffson ...
>>>
>>>Bill probably meant Jeff Rulifson <Jeff.Rulifson@eng.sun.com>.
>>>Presumably, he was the system architect for AUGMENT. You can try him
>>>yourself, or (better still), have Doug get him involved. [I was actually
>>>surprised to not see him at Doug's 80th Birthday party!]
>>>
>>> > ... best way to get Ken Harrenstien involved ...
>>>
>>>I guess if we work asynchronously through email, wiki, etc. (that
>>>actually would be the preferred mode for me too), I don't think we
>>>should have much problems. Comments ... other suggestions?
>>>
>>>-ppy
>>>--
>>>
>>>Philip Gust wrote Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:25:43 -0800:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>It was great to see both of you again at Doug's party. Thanks for
>>>>your continued interest in working on the CHM pilot project to
>>>>preserve Augment/NLS as part of the CHM's software conservation
>>>>committee.
>>>>I want to apologize again that it's taken so long to get back to you
>>>>on getting an initial meeting. I'm also our company's acting CFO
>>>>and we need to have all our documents filed for FY 2004 by Feb 15th,
>>>>so things have been just little busy. I'd like to see if both of you
>>>>would be available for an organizing meeting next Monday or Tuesday.
>>>>We could meet for breakfast, or get together for dinner either day.
>>>>I know that Jonathan has some constraints that make morning or
>>>>evening the best time to meet. Peter, would you be available either
>>>>of those days?
>>>>
>>>>There are several people that we should consider getting involved
>>>>as active participants that we can talk about when we meet.
>>>>At the party I met Raylene Pak, who still works with Augment and
>>>>even recompiles it with some regularity. It would be great if she was
>>>>interested in getting involved, but I don't know how to contact her.
>>>>Do either of you know her well enough to have her contact info?
>>>>Bill English also suggested someone named Jeff Oloffson who he
>>>>says still might be at Sun and knows everything worth knowing
>>>>about the Augment architecture. Do either of you know anything
>>>>about him?
>>>>Finally, we need to think through the best way to get Ken
>>>>Harrenstien involved. I understand that it would be hard for him to
>>>>meet in person frequently, but he's a really great guy and very
>>>>knowledgeable.about running the Augment system. We clearly
>>>>need to make much of our interactions virtual to enable him to
>>>>be involved as fully as he's willing to be.
>>>>Anyway, give this a little thought, and let me know about your
>>>>availability. Feel free to suggest alternate times and days. The
>>>>next CHM SCC meeting is next Wednesday, and I'd dearly
>>>>love to report some progress by then.
>>>>Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>Philip Gust
>>>>Nouveau Systems, Inc.
>>>>phone: +1 650 961-7992
>>>>fax: +1 508 526-8142
>>>>
>>>>mailto: gust@NouveauSystems.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Philip Gust
>>>Nouveau Systems, Inc.
>>>
>>>phone: +1 650 961-7992
>>>fax: +1 508 526-8142
>>>
>>>
>>>mailto: gust@NouveauSystems.com
>>
>
>
>Philip Gust
>Nouveau Systems, Inc.
>
>phone: +1 650 961-7992
>fax: +1 508 526-8142
>
>
>mailto: gust@NouveauSystems.com (02)
|