Raylene, (01)
One more thought ... by the time I do the system walk-through
with Phil this evening (after 6pm), if I don't see you
subscribing your bootstrap.org e-mail address to [nls-restore]
yourself, Phil and I will just do it as part of our list-admin
exercise. :-) (02)
Cheers. =ppy
-- (03)
Peter Yim wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:38:07 -0800:
> Raylene,
>
> My apologies, I mistakenly providing the wrong subscription page (the
> one I supplied earlier was for the [chm-test] list - didn't realize it
> until I saw your subscription going through there) in my earlier message.
>
> The correct url should be (please re-subscribe via) the following:
>
> http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/nls-restore
>
> (or, just let me know if you are busy, so I can transfer your
> subscription over.)
>
> Regards. =ppy
> -- (04)
> Peter Yim wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:35:40 -0800:
>
>> Hi Raylene & Phil,
>>
>> Glad you help bring this issue out to the open ... it's a perennial
>> teething problem of most mailing lists.
>>
>> The rest is generic ... everyone on the list is invited to take note:
>>
>> This [nls-restore] forum (an archived mailing list, with full text
>> search and purple number support) is configured to allow posting to
>> and (optional) distribution to "subscribers only". The web-based
>> archive, however, is viewable by everyone in the CHM community (i.e.
>> all who are given the chm-member role-based authentication
>> username/password pair.)
>>
>> So far, Phil has probably only subscribed everyone with one e-mail
>> address (the one we've been using). What is most commonly done, is for
>> people to (optionally) get subscribed on all possible e-mail addresses
>> that they might post from (so that posting is allowed from any of
>> them); but then, they pick one (or, optionally, more than one) among
>> those, to get mail (and set the others addresses to a "no mail"
>> configuration.)
>>
>> That said, if Raylene had also been subscribed (prior to all these)
>> with both her, say, @bootstrap.org and @sbcglobal.net, e-mail
>> addresses, and then having set the @bootstrap.org address to the "no
>> mail" configuration by *disabling* *mail delivery*, then things would
>> have gone through the way she had meant for them to.
>>
>> As such,
>>
>> ALL: please subscribe yourselves (and set your preferred options) at:
>> http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/chm-test
>> Or sending Phil or myself your multiple address (and your mail
>> delivery option for each), then we'll be all set.
>>
>> Let me know if there is any question.
>>
>> Cheers. =ppy
>>
>> P.S. Btw, the item is NOT pending approval ... we get so much spam
>> (from non-subscribers to any of the lists we host) that we just
>> totally ignore and discard anything that doesn't go through
>> automatically these days. =ppy
>> -- (05)
>> Philip Gust wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:06:48 -0800:
>>
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>> Rayleen should be listed as a "member". Perhaps I did something
>>> wrong in adding people. Could you please check this and make sure
>>> that all active members can post directly? Also, could you check on
>>> whether this item awaiting approval?
>>>
>>> Rayleen, sorry for the inconvenience. I'm still new at using the
>>> CIM3 system. Peter has promised to give me a brain transplant to
>>> correct that this evening ;^{)> (06)
>>> At 12:37 PM 3/18/2005, Raylene Pak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Peter,
>>>> Yes, my mistake, it was sent to the nls-restore list, not the
>>>> nls-release list. However, I sent it from my Augment email account
>>>> since I wanted a copy in the journal there, etc. I received a
>>>> canned message back saying that since I was a non-member submitting
>>>> to that mailing list that the email submitted needed to be reviewed
>>>> by the list moderator before it would be "accepted".
>>>> Raylene (07)
>>>> */Peter Yim <peter.yim@cim3.com>/* wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:09:13
>>>> -0800:
>>>>
>>>> Raylene,
>>>>
>>>> just a quick question, ref your:
>>>>
>>>> > I emailed a copy of this list to Doug and
>>>> > to the nls-release email list.
>>>>
>>>> Did you mean the [nls-restore] (i.e. this list)?
>>>> I don't see your message archived ... so, maybe (a) you did mean
>>>> another list, (b) that your message had gone to the wrong place,
>>>> or (c) there was trouble with the list (in either distributing
>>>> your message or with archiving it.)
>>>>
>>>> Could we look into that, please.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. =ppy
>>>> -- (08)
>>>> Raylene Pak wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:24:10 -0800 (PST:
>>>> > Jonathan,
>>>> > On Wednesday, I generated a list of all the directories on the
>>>> BI5 and
>>>> > annotated each with its proposed disposition for the release
>>>> version. I
>>>> > emailed a copy of this list to Doug and to the nls-release email
>>>> list.
>>>> > I then called Doug and requested that he review the list.
>>>> ...[snip]...
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/
To Post: mailto:nls-restore@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/wiki/ (09)
|