Raylene, (01)
Sorry, I just made a post about your subscription (without having
seen this message of yours.) (02)
If your password came from, say, <mailman-owner@chm.cim3.net> and
addressed to your <bootstrap.org> e-mail address, then that is
from the mailman system, and is intended just for use in
maintaining your mailing list configuration (which you can almost
forget about ... because you'll hardly ever need it again, and
the system will resend that as a reminder at the end of every month.) (03)
The "chm-member/***" credentials is what you will constantly need
to use, to get into any of the workspace within the CHM-CWE
(Collaborative Work Environment). (04)
As for repeat use of the auth credentials, I guess if we are
talking about potentially different communities/teams that may or
may not want to expose their work to one another, then different
passwords would be in order (and vice versa.) In our case, I
think we are talking about a trusted community ... and thus, it
would be simpler if people are working with just one set of
credentials (... and that's probably already one set too many!)
... That said, Phil should have the final say on this. I'll defer
to him. (05)
I'm going to copy this to the forum for archival purposes, as
others will probably have the same question when they receive the
mailman password too. (06)
Cheers. =ppy
-- (07)
Raylene Pak wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:05:39 -0800 (PST):
> Peter,
> Glad to hear that I am not the only one making typos these days.
> Anyway, I will resubsribe (and unsubscribe) later. I do have one other
> question: I received a password for
> the http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/ website, but no user name. I
> tried the "usual suspects" when it came to a user name(e.g. my email
> address), but none of them seemed to work in conjunction with the
> password supplied. Philip Gust gave me the chm-member user name and
> password and I have used that on a couple occaisons. What user name
> should I be using? Should I just continue to use the one I just set up
> for my Augment account? Or is there something else you would prefer I use?
> Raylene (08)
> */Peter Yim <peter.yim@cim3.com>/* wrote:
>
> Raylene,
>
> My apologies, I mistakenly providing the wrong subscription page
> (the one I supplied earlier was for the [chm-test] list - didn't
> realize it until I saw your subscription going through there) in
> my earlier message.
>
> The correct url should be (please re-subscribe via) the following:
>
> http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/nls-restore
>
> (or, just let me know if you are busy, so I can transfer your
> subscription over.)
>
> Regards. =ppy
> -- (09)
> Peter Yim wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:35:40 -0800:
> > Hi Raylene & Phil,
> >
> > Glad you help bring this issue out to the open ... it's a
> > perennial teething problem of most mailing lists.
> >
> > The rest is generic ... everyone on the list is invited to take note:
> >
> > This [nls-restore] forum (an archived mailing list, with full
> &g! t; text search and purple number support) is configured to allow
> > posting to and (optional) distribution to "subscribers only". The
> > web-based archive, however, is viewable by everyone in the CHM
> > community (i.e. all who are given the chm-member role-based
> > authentication username/password pair.)
> >
> > So far, Phil has probably only subscribed everyone with one
> > e-mail address (the one we've been using). What is most commonly
> > done, is for people to (optionally) get subscribed on all
> > possible e-mail addresses that they might post from (so that
> > posting is allowed from any of them); but then, they pick one
> > (or, optionally, more than one) among those, to get mail (and set
> > the others addresses to a "no mail" configuration.)
> >
> > That said, if Raylene had also been subscribed (prior to all
> > these) with both her, say, @bootstrap.org and @sbcglobal.net,
> > e-mail addresse! s, and then having set the @bootstrap.org address
> > to the "no mail" configuration by *disabling* *mail delivery*,
> > then things would have gone through the way she had meant for
> > them to.
> >
> > As such,
> >
> > ALL: please subscribe yourselves (and set your preferred options)
> > at: http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/chm-test
> > Or sending Phil or myself your multiple address (and your mail
> > delivery option for each), then we'll be all set.
> >
> > Let me know if there is any question.
> >
> > Cheers. =ppy
> >
> > P.S. Btw, the item is NOT pending approval ... we get so much
> > spam (from non-subscribers to any of the lists we host) that we
> > just totally ignore and discard anything that doesn't go through
> > automatically these days. =ppy
> > --
>
>
> > Philip Gust wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:06:48 -0800:
> >
> >>Peter,
> >>
> >>Rayleen s! hould be listed as a "member". Perhaps I did something
> wrong
> >>in adding people. Could you please check this and make sure that all
> >>active members can post directly? Also, could you check on
> whether this
> >>item awaiting approval?
> >>
> >>Rayleen, sorry for the inconvenience. I'm still new at using the
> CIM3
> >>system. Peter has promised to give me a brain transplant to correct
> >>that this evening ;^{)>
>
>
> >>At 12:37 PM 3/18/2005, Raylene Pak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Peter,
> >>>Yes, my mistake, it was sent to the nls-restore list, not the
> >>>nls-release list. However, I sent it from my Augment email account
> >>>since I wanted a copy in the journal there, etc. I received a
> canned
> >>>message back saying that since I was a non-member submitting to
> that
> >>>mailing list that the email submitted needed to be reviewed by the
> >>>list moderator before it would be "accepted".
> >>>Raylene
>
>
> >>>*/Peter Yim /* wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:09:13 -0800:
> >>>
> >>> Raylene,
> >>>
> >>> just a quick question, ref your:
> >>>
> >>> > I emailed a copy of this list to Doug and
> >>> > to the nls-release email list.
> >>>
> >>> Did you mean the [nls-restore] (i.e. this list)?
> >>> I don't see your message archived ... so, maybe (a) you did mean
> >>> another list, (b) that your message had gone to the wrong place,
> >>> or (c) there was trouble with the list (in either distributing
> >>> your message or with archiving it.)
> >>>
> >>> Could we look into that, please.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks. =ppy
> >>> --
>
>
> >>> Raylene Pak wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:24:10 ! -0800 (PST:
> >>> > Jonathan,
> >>> > On Wednesday, I generated a list of all the directories on the
> >>> BI5 and
> >>> > annotated each with its proposed disposition for the release
> >>> version. I
> >>> > emailed a copy of this list to Doug and to the nls-release email
> >>> list.
> >>> > I then called Doug and requested that he review the list.
> >>> ...[snip]...
> ______________________
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/
To Post: mailto:nls-restore@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/wiki/ (010)
|