Raylene, (01)
My apologies, I mistakenly providing the wrong subscription page
(the one I supplied earlier was for the [chm-test] list - didn't
realize it until I saw your subscription going through there) in
my earlier message. (02)
The correct url should be (please re-subscribe via) the following: (03)
http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/nls-restore (04)
(or, just let me know if you are busy, so I can transfer your
subscription over.) (05)
Regards. =ppy
-- (06)
Peter Yim wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:35:40 -0800:
> Hi Raylene & Phil,
>
> Glad you help bring this issue out to the open ... it's a
> perennial teething problem of most mailing lists.
>
> The rest is generic ... everyone on the list is invited to take note:
>
> This [nls-restore] forum (an archived mailing list, with full
> text search and purple number support) is configured to allow
> posting to and (optional) distribution to "subscribers only". The
> web-based archive, however, is viewable by everyone in the CHM
> community (i.e. all who are given the chm-member role-based
> authentication username/password pair.)
>
> So far, Phil has probably only subscribed everyone with one
> e-mail address (the one we've been using). What is most commonly
> done, is for people to (optionally) get subscribed on all
> possible e-mail addresses that they might post from (so that
> posting is allowed from any of them); but then, they pick one
> (or, optionally, more than one) among those, to get mail (and set
> the others addresses to a "no mail" configuration.)
>
> That said, if Raylene had also been subscribed (prior to all
> these) with both her, say, @bootstrap.org and @sbcglobal.net,
> e-mail addresses, and then having set the @bootstrap.org address
> to the "no mail" configuration by *disabling* *mail delivery*,
> then things would have gone through the way she had meant for
> them to.
>
> As such,
>
> ALL: please subscribe yourselves (and set your preferred options)
> at: http://chm.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/chm-test
> Or sending Phil or myself your multiple address (and your mail
> delivery option for each), then we'll be all set.
>
> Let me know if there is any question.
>
> Cheers. =ppy
>
> P.S. Btw, the item is NOT pending approval ... we get so much
> spam (from non-subscribers to any of the lists we host) that we
> just totally ignore and discard anything that doesn't go through
> automatically these days. =ppy
> -- (07)
> Philip Gust wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:06:48 -0800:
>
>>Peter,
>>
>>Rayleen should be listed as a "member". Perhaps I did something wrong
>>in adding people. Could you please check this and make sure that all
>>active members can post directly? Also, could you check on whether this
>>item awaiting approval?
>>
>>Rayleen, sorry for the inconvenience. I'm still new at using the CIM3
>>system. Peter has promised to give me a brain transplant to correct
>>that this evening ;^{)> (08)
>>At 12:37 PM 3/18/2005, Raylene Pak wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Peter,
>>>Yes, my mistake, it was sent to the nls-restore list, not the
>>>nls-release list. However, I sent it from my Augment email account
>>>since I wanted a copy in the journal there, etc. I received a canned
>>>message back saying that since I was a non-member submitting to that
>>>mailing list that the email submitted needed to be reviewed by the
>>>list moderator before it would be "accepted".
>>>Raylene (09)
>>>*/Peter Yim <peter.yim@cim3.com>/* wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:09:13 -0800:
>>>
>>> Raylene,
>>>
>>> just a quick question, ref your:
>>>
>>> > I emailed a copy of this list to Doug and
>>> > to the nls-release email list.
>>>
>>> Did you mean the [nls-restore] (i.e. this list)?
>>> I don't see your message archived ... so, maybe (a) you did mean
>>> another list, (b) that your message had gone to the wrong place,
>>> or (c) there was trouble with the list (in either distributing
>>> your message or with archiving it.)
>>>
>>> Could we look into that, please.
>>>
>>> Thanks. =ppy
>>> -- (010)
>>> Raylene Pak wrote Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:24:10 -0800 (PST:
>>> > Jonathan,
>>> > On Wednesday, I generated a list of all the directories on the
>>> BI5 and
>>> > annotated each with its proposed disposition for the release
>>> version. I
>>> > emailed a copy of this list to Doug and to the nls-release email
>>> list.
>>> > I then called Doug and requested that he review the list.
>>> ...[snip]...
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/
To Post: mailto:nls-restore@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/wiki/ (011)
|