nls-legal
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nls-legal] BT response..

To: "Jonathan Cheyer" <jonathan@cheyer.biz>, "John Toole" <toole@computerhistory.org>
Cc: Philip Gust <gust@NouveauSystems.com>, Bernard Peuto <blpeuto@peuto.com>, NLS Restoration Legal Discussion <nls-legal@chm.cim3.net>
From: "Sally Abel" <SAbel@fenwick.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:31:30 -0800
Message-id: <BB3CFCDA3EDEA744A71B0665C959C79F1AD044@svcexch02.firm.fenwick.llp>
Phil did all the work and deserves the kudos.  I just got in the
way.....     (01)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Cheyer [mailto:jonathan@cheyer.biz] 
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:20 PM
To: John Toole
Cc: NLS Restoration Legal Discussion; Philip Gust; Sally Abel; Bernard
Peuto
Subject: Re: [nls-legal] BT response..    (02)

John,    (03)

This is really great news to get a written statement from BT! Thanks
again to you, Sally, and Phil for your help with all of this.    (04)

Jonathan    (05)


John Toole wrote:
> Just got a fax of the letter from Peter Radcliffe.
> 
>  
> 
> --John    (06)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-legal/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/  
To Post: mailto:nls-legal@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NLS_Restoration    (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>