nls-legal
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nls-legal] BT response..

To: "NLS Restoration Legal Discussion" <nls-legal@chm.cim3.net>, "Philip Gust" <gust@NouveauSystems.com>
Cc: Sally Abel <sabel@fenwick.com>, Bernard Peuto <blpeuto@peuto.com>
From: "Gust, Kathe" <kathe.gust@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:55:14 -0800
Message-id: <D8BFB26B9AEA6F45806156E0A1A4B1B649450C@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net>
I think I would agree with John at this point.  We don't have everything finished and posting things might mess it up.  Also,
this was a rather complicated process and would take quite a lot of documentation which might be boring to those who are
not interested in doing it.
 
I suggest it might be better to continue to say something inspecific such as "progress is being made" even on the SCC internal
site until all the ducks are in the bag. 
 
At that point we can write up something about "clearance has been granted by those who potentially had copyright interest"
without not naming any names.  If others wanted to pursue the method used, they could contact someone in the group offline
for a discussion of how it was done.
 
Kathe


From: nls-legal-bounces@chm.cim3.net [mailto:nls-legal-bounces@chm.cim3.net] On Behalf Of John Toole
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:41 PM
To: Philip Gust
Cc: Sally Abel; Bernard Peuto; nls-legal@chm.cim3.net
Subject: Re: [nls-legal] BT response..

Phil,

 

Somehow, I don’t necessarily think it may be a good idea to post, but could be convinced otherwise.  I don’t want to keep a quasi-public trail of the legal history and imply a precedent for all our software, when fair use may more generally apply.  Others seeing it may conclude that this is the only way to go, although it certainly shows our (your) due diligence.   We simply don’t know where it’s going.  If you wanted to encourage others to follow, you could always do that one on one.  However, the overhead for this one piece of software is frightening. 

 

--John

 

 


From: Philip Gust [mailto:gust@NouveauSystems.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:27 PM
To: John Toole
Cc: nls-legal@chm.cim3.net; Sally Abel; Bernard Peuto
Subject: Re: BT response..

 

John,

Thanks for your help with this.  It's great to have one piece of the legal firmly in place and nailed down.  Hopefully, we'll be able to use this as leverage at both Boeing and MCI/Verizon.  Would you have any issue with our adding the PDF of this letter to NLS/Augment restoration site document archives?  At present, the site is available only to SCC members and close friends (e.g. Henry Lowood).

At 10:05 AM 3/6/2006, John Toole wrote:

Just got a fax of the letter from Peter Radcliffe.
 
--John
 


Philip Gust
Nouveau Systems, Inc.
3120 De La Cruz Blvd., Suite 120
Santa Clara, CA 95054

phone: +1 650 961-7992
fax:   +1 520 843-7217

mailto: gust@NouveauSystems.com

Nouveau Systems collaboration-enabled infrastructure and applications enable integrated information management, process automation and knowledge capture.  To learn how Nouveau Systems products can help your knowledge-based organization drive innovation, visit: http://www.NouveauSystems.com


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-legal/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/  
To Post: mailto:nls-legal@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NLS_Restoration    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>