ERRATA: (01)
"Memory: 8GB PC3200 400MHz ECC DDR SDRAM RDIMM"
(was: "Memory: 8GB ECC SDRAM"
updated below =ppy)
-- (02)
Peter Yim wrote Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:20:53 -0700:
> Mine is inline too. =ppy
> --
>
> Jonathan Cheyer wrote Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:41:49 -0700:
>
>> Ken, thanks for replying.
>>
>> My own comments are also inline.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>> Ken Harrenstien wrote Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:14:24 EDT:
>>
>>> OK, I'm back and catching up...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> At 03:49 PM 6/17/2005, Raylene Pak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan,
>>>>> 1. While the emulator can share an IP address with the other
>>>>> applications that run on the newell.cim3.com machine, the emulated
>>>>> DEC20/Augment host requires its own IP address.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I assume that all Peter has to do is allocate a additional IP
>>>> address, and configure the virtual interface to allow two IP
>>>> addresses for the same MAC. Presumably, there's no need to have
>>>> second network card. It that correct?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Only if you don't care about connecting to the virtual 20 from the
>>> same machine it's running on. Linux, AFAIK, has never correctly
>>> supported tapping into the outbound packet stream. So, if you want to
>>> telnet from the native system into the emulated DEC20, you either have
>>> to first telnet out to some other place, and then back into the
>>> DEC20... or have a second ethernet port dedicated to the DEC20. In
>>> practice, the second NIC is the simplest/cheapest workaround and makes
>>> it easier to debug problems.
>>>
>>> Many dual-processor boards have dual NICs on them already. You might
>>> check to see if this one does.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan: Yes, I spoke with Peter about this already, and he is going
>> to place another NIC card into the machine to be available as a second
>> external IP. (The existing dual NIC is already used up for one
>> external and one internal IP number.) This will be available by
>> Monday, and then I'll post the second IP number to this list so that
>> Raylene has the information.
>>
>>
>>> [klh] That sounds good, although at 1.13GHz your response is not
>>> going to be quite as spiffy as that of the current BI system :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> [jc] If we notice any slowdown of any kind, I'm sure Peter can make
>> available for us a faster machine, right Peter? ;-)
>
>
> [ppy] Jonathan and I had actually decided to put this onto a different
> box ... (you're going to like this) ...
>
> Instead of newell.cim3.com (ref:
> http://chm.cim3.net/forum//nls-restore/2005-06/msg00022.html#nid02),
> we'll now be using:
>
> Hostname: pascal.cim3.com
> (we'll give this the alias nls01.cim3.com & nls01.cim3.net)
> Ext IP address: 64.62.192.13 & 64.62.192.14 (.14 for nls01 use)
> Hardware: IBM e326 Dual Opteron 250 2 x 2.4GHz
> - 1 MB cache processor SMP
> Memory: 8GB PC3200 400MHz ECC DDR SDRAM RDIMM
> OS: GNU/Linux - Fedora Core 4 distribution (FC4-x86_64)
> Kernel: 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp
>
> I'll let you guys know when the box is at the cim3-fmt1 colo facility.
> We'll be getting 100Mbps full burstable bandwidth into a multi OC-48
> self-healing fiber ring backbone.
>
>>> We'll probably need to recompile the emulator; as long as you included
>>> GCC (C compiler) during the FC3 install, things should be fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, the box has the standard gcc, make, and the other usual developer
>> tools loaded so it shouldn't be a problem.
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/
>> Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
>> Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/ To Post:
>> mailto:nls-restore@chm.cim3.net
>> Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/wiki/
>>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-restore/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/
To Post: mailto:nls-restore@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/wiki/ (03)
|