nls-technical
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nls-technical] [Fwd: Re: NLS/AUGMENT question.]

To: Alex Bochannek <alex@p9.com>
Cc: NLS Restoration Technical Discussion <nls-technical@chm.cim3.net>, Ken Harrenstien <klh@panix.com>
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <alpine.OSX.0.83.0703032158550.21994@pangtzu.panda.com>
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Alex Bochannek wrote:
> This isn't my broken version of GCC, of course, but the current stable GCC
> as well as what has been shipping with popular x86 Linux distributions for
> well over a year.    (01)

Well, all I can say is that I have not encountered this problem.  I am 
however aware of quite a few other bugs in recent Linux distributions.    (02)

> I leave it up to Keith and Jonathan to weigh the
> importance of providing KLH10 in source for those platforms versus leaving
> KLH10 unchanged.    (03)

As I said, the easiest way to resolve the problem is probably to add
        -Dregister=
to the CFLAGS in the Makefile.  This effectively no-ops all the "register" 
declarations.    (04)

-- Mark --    (05)

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.    (06)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://chm.cim3.net/forum/nls-technical/
Shared Files: http://chm.cim3.net/file/work/project/nls-restore/
Community Portal: http://www.computerhistory.org/  
To Post: mailto:nls-technical@chm.cim3.net
Community Wiki: http://chm.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NLS_Restoration    (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>